We read in Daniel 5:29 of King Belshazzar who made Daniel the “third ruler in the kingdom.”
Belshazzar’s feast, depicted in the famous painting below, is a memorable scene in the biblical account of the last days of Babylon.
For decades biblical skeptics scoffed at all this because there were no historical records that identified any Babylonian king of that name.
The Greek historians Herodotus and Xenophon make no mention of him.
The last Babylonian king was Nabonidus.
Biblical skeptics, sitting in their armchairs at prestigious European universities, said Belshazzar was obviously a made-up or legendary figure.
Then in 1854 the Nabonidus cylinders were uncovered at the Temple of Ur in southern Mesopotamia.
These cuneiform records name Belshazzar and identify him as Nabonidus’s eldest son.
Another passage testifies that while Nabonidus was away his son ruled in his place.
So Belshazzar is now historically validated. Not only that , but we now see that Nabonidus was the first ruler and Belshazzar the second.
Therefore Belshazzar could not have given Daniel any higher title than to be the third man in line.
Daniel’s peculiar reference to himself being designated as the “third ruler” is thereby explained.
More here:
https://a.co/d/02tw1wQb